Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site ndm20 Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!ndm20!tp From: tp@ndm20 Newsgroups: net.news Subject: Re: A proposal for a modified voting ru Message-ID: <4000008@ndm20> Date: Sun, 29-Sep-85 03:45:00 EDT Article-I.D.: ndm20.4000008 Posted: Sun Sep 29 03:45:00 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 1-Oct-85 03:29:59 EDT References: <3215@nsc.UUCP> Lines: 25 Nf-ID: #R:nsc.UUCP:-321500:ndm20:4000008:000:1451 Nf-From: ndm20!tp Sep 29 02:45:00 1985 >the computer centers are autonomous organizations. Many times these >organizations do not have the insight to understand the needs and desires >of their user community, nor is it practical for them to poll there user >community. The Holmdel computer center probably has greater than several >thousand UNIX users (my guess). Um, so you want to be able to send your votes (collected in some manner, note that auto-deletion based on usage is a form of vote) outside of your organization (to the net), to avoid their influence on the news that they have to administer and pay for? I still feel the net has no right to pay attention to anyone by the SA on such matters. Internal issues should remain internal. Holmdel could, for instance, appoint a user or committee of users to decide the vote for the site. Usenet, considered as an abstract entity, has no right to bypass the SA. The SA is in charge of resources, and that is the whole issue here. Any SA who doesn't want the burden can pass the buck. I'm sure if this idea gets anywhere, someone will post a vote collection program to ease the burden on a large site. Then Holmdel could just let the users vote into the system, take the results as their vote, and that is it. If someone writes such a thing it could have an option to automatically sample the votes, turn them into for/against votes, and mail them out to whoever gets stuck counting them. Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com