Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 (MC840302); site kuling.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!mcvax!enea!kuling!christer
From: christer@kuling.UUCP (Christer Johansson)
Newsgroups: net.nlang
Subject: Re: Second Person Plural
Message-ID: <814@kuling.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Sep-85 14:20:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: kuling.814
Posted: Wed Sep 18 14:20:31 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Sep-85 07:44:36 EDT
References: <2609@ihnss.UUCP> <864@ptsfa.UUCP>
Reply-To: christer@kuling.UUCP (Christer Johansson)
Followup-To: net.nlang
Organization: (Studying CS at) the University of Uppsala, Sweden
Lines: 18
Summary: Wasn't termination -th used on verbs in 3:rd person singular?

In article <864@ptsfa.UUCP> of Tue, 10-Sep-85 20:17:17 GMT
rob@ptsfa.UUCP (Rob Bernardo) writes:
>In the table below, I have given all the forms of English verbs
>as distinguishable by morphology
>
>verb form		'be'		ALL      other     verbs
>					"irregular"	"regular"
>					(e.g. 'do')	(e.g. 'walk')
>
>present other (i.e 3 person) singulars	is	does	  walks

Shouldn't does and walks be doth and walkth?
(As in the Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away)
-- 
Snail Mail: Christer Johansson	  Net Mail: {seismo,mcvax}!enea!kuling!christer
            Sernandersv. 9:136
            S-752 63  Uppsala       Phone:     Int. +46 - 18 46 31 54
            SWEDEN                             Nat. 018 - 46 31 54


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com