Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site hpfcrs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!hpfcdc!hpfcla!lief
From: lief@hpfcla.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.origins
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <14600048@hpfcrs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 16:00:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hpfcrs.14600048
Posted: Mon Sep 30 16:00:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Oct-85 06:15:05 EDT
References: <14600042@hpfcrs.UUCP>
Organization: 30 Sep 85 14:00:00 MDT
Lines: 26

>Oh boy, now he's making a fool of himself:
>
>>      By the way, could you give me the calculations and physics involved
>> in explaining to me why the bumble-bee can fly?
>> Or why man uses less than 1/6 th of his brain?
>> Or perhaps share with us the chemical formula and
>> the synthetic equations needed to produce life from non life?
>> Perhaps give us the calculations that tell us why this planet has an
>> atmosphere of Nitrogen and Oxygen and the others don't.
>> How about using the "TOOLS OF PHYSICS" to tell me why I am writing this?
>
You guys really didn't have to answer this!  But still I thought it was neat
that you actually tried!  By asking these questions I was trying to convey
the idea that science cannot answer all of man's questions -- instead one needs
to look elsewhere for answers in many cases (for example, psychology would be
a necessary field for answering matters of the brains, and in most cases the
answers would only be models based on conjecture, not absolute truth.)  In
other words, the "TOOLS OF PHYSICS" cannot be used for 100% of all answers.

I know that the above questions all have answers (just don't ask me what they
are ) but to assume that we will find all the answers from just one myra is
too simplistic for me.

Lief Sorensen
HP Fort Collins, CO
Uucp ...!hpfcla!lief


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com