Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site petsd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mhuxn!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!petsd!cjh From: cjh@petsd.UUCP (Chris Henrich) Newsgroups: net.physics Subject: Re: Cancelling EM waves Message-ID: <648@petsd.UUCP> Date: Wed, 18-Sep-85 13:30:36 EDT Article-I.D.: petsd.648 Posted: Wed Sep 18 13:30:36 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 19-Sep-85 07:26:00 EDT References: <543@sri-arpa.ARPA> Reply-To: cjh@petsd.UUCP (PUT YOUR NAME HERE) Organization: Perkin-Elmer DSG, Tinton Falls, N.J. Lines: 34 Summary: Think about the interference pattern [] In article <543@sri-arpa.ARPA> DHowell.ES@Xerox.ARPA writes: >Here's a new subject to think about, start aguments, etc. > >Let's say I have a device that emits an electromagnetic wave. >Now I set up another one of these, and place ... > them half a wavelength apart so that >they are 180 degrees out of phase, [so that] the waves will cancel. >Now I appear to be getting no energy out of this system, at least not >in the form of EM waves. I am still putting as much energy into the >system. All I did was move one of the devices. What is happening to >the energy? The two waves do not exactly cancel; at some points they do, but at other points they re-inforce each other. So, if the amplitude of one wave is 1, the amplitude of the combined wave varies from 0 to 2. What does this imply about the total energy? Well, the energy is a *quadratic* function of the field strength, so it varies from 0 to 4. Take an average, for a rough guess, and you get 2. Two sources, twice as much energy. This can all be made very much more difficult, by trying to decide exact patter of radiation is from each source, then setting up and solving a messy integration problem... Regards, Chris -- Full-Name: Christopher J. Henrich UUCP: ..!(cornell | ariel | ukc | houxz)!vax135!petsd!cjh US Mail: MS 313; Perkin-Elmer; 106 Apple St; Tinton Falls, NJ 07724 Phone: (201) 758-7288 Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com