Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rochester.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ray
From: ray@rochester.UUCP (Ray Frank)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.religion
Subject: Re: "Secular Humanism" banned in the US Schools.
Message-ID: <11706@rochester.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Sep-85 09:30:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: rocheste.11706
Posted: Wed Sep 18 09:30:24 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Sep-85 11:05:15 EDT
References: <11463@rochester.UUCP> <620@hou2g.UUCP> <11616@rochester.UUCP> <1710@pyuxd.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Rochester, CS Dept.
Lines: 35
Xref: linus net.politics:10343 net.religion:7267

> > Look, it's about time you and everyone else stop thinking of PP as an
> > information center on sex.  They give out pills and abortions and a little
> > bullshit.  Their main objective is not information, it is 'safe sex' and
> > 'safe abortions.'
> 
> Ray, it's about time you STARTED thinking, and presenting facts.  I have yet
> to see a single solitary one fact from you in all your articles.  Do you have
> any to offer?  I think dispensing data about making sex safe and describing
> alternatives to people IS the very purpose of an information center on sex,
> and I for one am glad they do it.  Tell me, are you Ken Arndt in a new
> location?  Or did Ken just give you lessons on how a rampant know-nothing
> can disrupt a discussion forum?
> -- 
> Anything's possible, but only a few things actually happen.
> 					Rich Rosen    pyuxd!rlr

Rich, you've done it again, you 'HACKED' off the end of my posting seemingly  
to help in substantiating your point of view.  This is nothing short of
censorship.  If your argument cannot bear up under it's own weight, then
re-think your argument and present it in such a way that by it's own merits
the crutch of censorship is eliminated.

This is a lively topic open to much disention.  To dimiss as rampant a view
you disagree with is nothing short of emotional tyranny which in turn degen-
erates into salvos of name calling and character assination which in turn does
more to disrupt a discussion than all the contrasting points of view
the world has to offer.  You cannot say this is my ball and if you don't
play by my rules I'm taking it home and we won't play at all.  This is not
YOUR net, you can't take it home, I will play and not necessarily by your  
definitions and if you don't agree than YOU can indeed go home, but not 
with the ball.

floweringly 

   ray            


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com