Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site mit-vax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!talcott!panda!genrad!mit-eddie!mit-vax!csdf
From: csdf@mit-vax.UUCP (Charles Forsythe)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: re; how a competent KGB agent does his job
Message-ID: <863@mit-vax.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 22-Sep-85 06:58:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-vax.863
Posted: Sun Sep 22 06:58:05 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Sep-85 10:00:30 EDT
References: <482@decwrl.UUCP>
Reply-To: csdf@mit-vax.UUCP (Charles Forsythe)
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 77

I must congratulate Mr. Oded Feingold on his excellent investigations
into the activities of KGB operatives on the net. It seems that he has
flushed out another one:

In article <482@decwrl.UUCP> bottom@katadn.DEC writes:
>Interesting reading. It appears that Don is a KGB agent and I never knew 
>it.

Likely story. Let's read on...

> Your urban Masshole attitudes show in statements like "Cow Hampshire"
>Jealous of the tax base up north perhaps?? I know you servants of the 
>great state of taxachusits have your burdens don't you? 

An interesting assault on the capitalist economy. Taxes are the dues
that Americans pay so that their government can function. Perhaps we
should opt for state-owned businesses to rake in revenue for "the
people". A good example is the New Hampshire State Liquor Store
business.  Mr. Marx could not have done better himself: selling drugs to
finance the government!

> To belittle Don's service contributions during the Vietnam non-war is also 
>indicative of the type of person you must be, no doubt *you* were smart 
>enough to avoid the war, hiding behind your deferment perhaps? Or were 
>you one of the many brave men who just ran? I don't even care to hear 
>your answer. It makes no difference. 

Here we see the opinion that one should support the military no matter
what the MORALS of the situation are. I wonder what Comrade Bottom's
opinions of the Russian invasion of Afghanistan are?

> Don as I have said before may have "rightist" political views, but he 
>is willing to do what so many of you armchair liberal, non-violent 
>types are not, he is willing to put his personal welfare aside in favor 
>of the group, which of course includes you.

In other words, Comrade Black fights "for the people?" I've heard that
one before. Any readers who haven't should read "The Communist
Manifesto."

> Perhaps Mr. Fiengold, you have been angered by Don's constant attacks 
>             ^^^^^^^^
>on the Jewish Defense League? Maybe you're a member?

I see that you are angered by Oded's attacks on the KGB...

> Don's definition of freedom is based on interpertation of the 
>Constitution not a redefinition of it.

Good old Webster's Dictionary defines "interpret" as:"to conceive in
the light of individual opinion, judgment or circumstance." There are a
lot of people in America that are willing to believe that a communist
state is the only way to truly realize the goals of the Constitution.
All they need is a clever KGB agent to put them into action. Let's look
at this statement again:

"...but he is willing to do what so many of you armchair liberal,
non-violent types are not..."

Would that include arming a band of revolutionaries to overthrow the US
government in the name of some "new order" of "freedom?" Just wondering.

>PS: If you plan a vacation to Maine, forget it, just mail us your money 
>and we'll see it gets to the right people.

I think that the funds you recieve from Mother Russia ought to be
sufficient (or did you guys spend too much on American wheat again this
year?)

-- 
Charles Forsythe
CSDF@MIT-VAX

"What? With her?"

-Adam from _The_Book_of_Genesis_


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com