Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hou2g.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!hou2g!scott From: scott@hou2g.UUCP (Racer X) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Schools and Churches (really 'support' for areligious moral codes) Message-ID: <639@hou2g.UUCP> Date: Fri, 20-Sep-85 10:11:44 EDT Article-I.D.: hou2g.639 Posted: Fri Sep 20 10:11:44 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 21-Sep-85 04:39:24 EDT References: <5934@cbscc.UUCP> Organization: The Finish Line Lines: 15 Paul Dubuc: > This is a transcendent standard, one that subjects >that king to the law as well as the peasant. If the law is not based >on a transcendent authority, then it is whatever the king (or government >in today's terms) says it is; those in power define right and wrong. This sounds like the Christian God. The one "in power" determines right and wrong. Why is this less arbitrary? The Christian "king" doesn't follow the morals he preaches, why should I? Scott J. Berry Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com