Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site sysvis Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!convex!sysvis!george From: george@sysvis Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Re: Don Black (from net.flame?) Message-ID: <-145727670@sysvis> Date: Mon, 23-Sep-85 17:18:00 EDT Article-I.D.: sysvis.-145727670 Posted: Mon Sep 23 17:18:00 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 26-Sep-85 08:07:50 EDT References: <1457276@sysvis> Lines: 19 Nf-ID: #R:sysvis:-145727671:sysvis:-145727670:000:1080 Nf-From: sysvis!george Sep 23 16:18:00 1985 [...] Good discussion, Don Black. It does the "jew" well to remember that "Judah" was only one of the (smaller) tribes of Israel (and that the Bible clearly distinguishes Judah and Israel in prophecy). You have summarized your position quite well, but to those who would like to hear more about these concepts you are opening discussion on, it would be nice to give some hard references for your material. I'm sure that a lot of the readers would like to decide for themselves whether those things you say are actually of history or of your own fantasy. As a practi- cing member of the Christian Identity group, could you also give some infor- mation about where the more readily available information is to be located? Lastly, I personally feel that this discussion should be in net.religion rather than in net.flame. Anyone else wish to comment on this? By the way, do the etymologies of the words "semite" and "samaritan" (via Shem) correspond in any way that is verifiable or reasonable? Are you say- ing than "Dansmark" was of the tribe of Israel called "Dan"? Why? Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com