Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site utflis.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsri!utai!utflis!brown From: brown@utflis.UUCP (Susan Brown) Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Re: Settling Star Trek argument.... Message-ID: <290@utflis.UUCP> Date: Wed, 2-Oct-85 15:47:17 EDT Article-I.D.: utflis.290 Posted: Wed Oct 2 15:47:17 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 17:43:06 EDT References: <3704@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <254@hyper.UUCP> Reply-To: brown@utflis.UUCP (Susan Brown) Organization: FLIS, University of Toronto Lines: 13 Summary: In article <254@hyper.UUCP> brust@hyper.UUCP (Steven Brust) writes: >"Mehuselah" is correct. There is an sf writer who is currently >working on a Star Trek novel that will be a sequal to this >episode, and attempt to plug some of the historical and >characterization holes it left. The book is not under >contract, so I don't know if will sell, but the draft is >near completion and reads quite well. In fact reads >very, very, VERY well--for a Star Trek novel. So give! Who? Where? Maybe if they can't sell it to Pocket Books (the only publisher with permission from Paramount) they can sell it privately like a fanzine. ST Fandom can get to work on this. Thanks. Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com