Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site laidbak.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!laidbak!jeq
From: jeq@laidbak.UUCP (Jonathan E. Quist)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: How net.personals would work
Message-ID: <211@laidbak.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 14-Sep-85 23:48:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: laidbak.211
Posted: Sat Sep 14 23:48:00 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Sep-85 12:15:39 EDT
References: <3850024@csd2.UUCP>
Reply-To: jeq@laidbak.UUCP (Jonathan E. Quist)
Organization: LAI Chicago
Lines: 16
Summary: 

In article <3850024@csd2.UUCP> schwrtze@csd2.UUCP (Eric Schwartz group) writes:
>It just occured to me that if a net.personals was to be considered then
>surely one person would moderate it and leave No name or site address

By way of insuring privacy, perhaps the ideal solution
would be to automate the whole process.
It should be fairly straightforward to have personals posted
through a program which would generate a "personal id",
and then handle routing of responses.

Of course, somebody would have to write the code in the first place,
and convince a system administrator to install it....

Jonathan E. Quist
ihnp4!laidbak!jeq
``I deny this is a disclaimer.  On second thought...''


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com