Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site adobe.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!Glacier!adobe!greid
From: greid@adobe.UUCP (Glenn Reid)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: How net.personals would work
Message-ID: <675@adobe.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 16-Sep-85 04:10:42 EDT
Article-I.D.: adobe.675
Posted: Mon Sep 16 04:10:42 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Sep-85 03:25:24 EDT
References: <3850024@csd2.UUCP> <211@laidbak.UUCP>
Reply-To: greid@adobe.UUCP (Glenn Reid)
Distribution: net
Organization: Adobe Systems, Palo Alto
Lines: 20
Keywords: ridiculous

In article <211@laidbak.UUCP> jeq@laidbak.UUCP (Jonathan E. Quist) writes:
1>In article <3850024@csd2.UUCP> schwrtze@csd2.UUCP (Eric Schwartz group) writes:
>>It just occured to me that if a net.personals was to be considered then
>>surely one person would moderate it and leave No name or site address
>
>By way of insuring privacy, perhaps the ideal solution
>would be to automate the whole process.

This is all bullshit.

The reason net.personals is such a good idea is that nobody has to go through
anybody else (like a moderator) to get "set up" with some dream-body.

The reason it is such a bad idea is that nobody will post to it, because
nobody wants to be made a fool of on the net, and because it is ridiculous to
have somebody moderate something like this.

"It's ten after one in the morning, and you're going to post to net.singles
 because you think *other* people are nincompoops?!?"	(Tracy Larrabee)
Glennnnnnnreid


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com