Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!purtell
From: purtell@reed.UUCP (Lady Godiva)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Nominally single????
Message-ID: <1919@reed.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Sep-85 15:53:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: reed.1919
Posted: Thu Sep 19 15:53:46 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Sep-85 05:44:46 EDT
References: <285@whuts.UUCP> <533@oakhill.UUCP> <286@whuts.UUCP>
Reply-To: purtell@reed.UUCP (Lady Godiva)
Distribution: net
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon
Lines: 28
Summary: 

> 	Single:  unmarried (currently unmarried, I suppose, as the term
> divorcee is now archaic)
> 
> 	nominally Single:  unmarried but enjoying a close relationship with
> an SO (possibly living together but with at least two abodes)
> 
> 	Isnt this complicated?
> -- 
>                Hunter Scales

	Oh my - well, I'm enjoying a close relationship with an SO, but we 
only see each other about twice a week, spend only about one night a
week together, and we are free to date other people although we very
rarely do. So where does that place me? Does having an SO make me
nominally Single? And if so - wouldn't it be a disgrace for the person
who started this whole issue about living alone to only be "nominally
Single" and not *truely* single? Or do I not spend enough time with my
SO to qualify for "nominally Single"? If not, but if I can't be truely
Single (having an SO and all) then maybe there could be a whole new
type of Single for me. Pseudo-Single (sp?) maybe?

;-)

	cheers -

	elizabeth g. purtell

	(Lady Godiva)


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com