Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ut-sally.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!ut-sally!pooh
From: pooh@ut-sally.UUCP (Pooh @ Communist Martyrs High)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Nominally single????
Message-ID: <3043@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 29-Sep-85 13:56:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.3043
Posted: Sun Sep 29 13:56:17 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 08:27:35 EDT
References: <285@whuts.UUCP> <533@oakhill.UUCP> <286@whuts.UUCP> <1919@reed.UUCP> <158@aplvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: pooh@sally.UUCP (Pooh @ Communist Martyrs High)
Distribution: net
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 21
Summary: 

In article <158@aplvax.UUCP> reh@aplvax.UUCP (Ron E. Hall) writes:
>But it does seem to me that there is a division on the net between 
>people who are currently single but looking for a long-term relationship
>and others who are single and not looking. The first group is single
>mostly by circumstance (broke up, moved away, term ended, not ready yet,
>etc.) but intend to marry or settle down with someone as part of their 
>life-plan.  The second group is single by choice and their life-plan doesn't
>include a permanent live-in spouse or SO. 

How about those of us in the middle who like having SOs and
are open to meeting potential ones, but in the meantime are
trying to live happily and contentedly as singles?

I refuse to have a Life Plan either way.  I just like
to see what comes along.

Cheers,
Pooh

topaz!unipress!pooh      unipress!pooh@topaz.ARPA 
                         (unipress!pooh@topaz.rutgers.edu)


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com