Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site princeton.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!jsl
From: jsl@princeton.UUCP (Jong Lee)
Newsgroups: net.sport,net.news.group
Subject: Re: Tennis newsgroup (attn. Gene Spafford)
Message-ID: <1095@princeton.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 22-Sep-85 16:29:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: princeto.1095
Posted: Sun Sep 22 16:29:15 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 23-Sep-85 00:46:54 EDT
References: <493@ihlpm.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Princeton University EECS Dept
Lines: 21
Xref: watmath net.sport:507 net.news.group:3822

> --
 Make that 15 for net.tennis + about 3 more once I spread the word 
about the start up.  Looking forward to it!> 
> Lack of existing discussions is a factor against, but from my 
> experience the only thing inhibiting me was lack of interest
> in net.tv and cricket fans (no offence) in net.sport.
> 
> So, these are my thoughts on formation of net.sport.tennis,
> now some general reflections:
>  Having standard min of 40-50 postings/month is not justified,
> because some of the most populated groups do not carry such
> volume every month. E.g.: net.rec.ski is dead during north hemispere
> summer. Net.coke dries off in a month. Trouble is , personalized
> treatment takes a lot of time (I guess net admin does a good job
> already), but on the other hand, now groups are not created wholesale
> anyway.
> You guessed it, my general opinion supports my special plea!
> 	thanks for your attention 
> 		Mike Cherepov (tired like hell)

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com