Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site ssc-bee.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!ssc-bee!maa From: maa@ssc-bee.UUCP (Mark A Allyn) Newsgroups: net.dcom,net.video,net.ham-radio Subject: Re: Satellite viewing "freedoms" Message-ID: <372@ssc-bee.UUCP> Date: Tue, 17-Sep-85 10:13:16 EDT Article-I.D.: ssc-bee.372 Posted: Tue Sep 17 10:13:16 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 19-Sep-85 04:47:21 EDT References: <779@vortex.UUCP>, <262@mot.UUCP> <293@unccvax.UUCP> Organization: Boeing Aerospace Co., Seattle, WA Lines: 14 Xref: watmath net.dcom:1304 net.video:1518 net.ham-radio:3254 > The real solution to this whole mess is to leave the electronic media > alone, deregulate the heck out of it (except for technical matters such as > harmful interference and so on) and let good old American engineering solve > the problem of "freeloaders" . . . Come on - there you go along with everyone else. You just ruined your objective by including an exclusion clause. Why not go all the way and let the industry solve all of its own problems including interference. Eliminate the FCC. Once you stipulate something to regulate (harmfull interference, you open the floodgates for other exceptions. Mark Allyn WA1SEY !uw-beaver!ssc-vax!ssc-bee!maa Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com