Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tekla.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!teklds!dadla!tekla!hankb
From: hankb@tekla.UUCP (Hank Buurman)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: porn etc.
Message-ID: <331@tekla.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 20-Sep-85 00:31:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: tekla.331
Posted: Fri Sep 20 00:31:28 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Sep-85 05:08:50 EDT
References: <1914@reed.UUCP>
Reply-To: hankb@tekla.UUCP (Hank Buurman)
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 20

In article <1914@reed.UUCP> thoma@reed.UUCP (Ann Muir Thomas) writes:
>
>	I don't have time to post a comprehensive reply to this
>issue right now, but...
>
>	If someone took away my Anais Nin erotica on the grounds
>that it is degrading to women, I'd be pissed!
>
>	(on the other hand, I would like to know what percentage
>of females read/look at porn and other sexualy explicit materials;;
>nearly all the men I know do (or have at some time) but not so
>many of the women...and I agree with the person who finds romance
>novels just as offensive (or moreso) as non-violent porn.
>
>
In answer to your query, BOTH I and my Lady enjoy soft porn to a
great degree, Anais Nin's "Delta of Venus" especially. We'd be
pissed too.

             Hank    dadla!hankb


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com