Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site rochester.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ray
From: ray@rochester.UUCP (Ray Frank)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Possible Ban on Pornography
Message-ID: <11729@rochester.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Sep-85 10:46:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: rocheste.11729
Posted: Thu Sep 19 10:46:46 1985
Date-Received: Sun, 22-Sep-85 13:12:20 EDT
References: <369@scirtp.UUCP> <4500038@ccvaxa> <2504@watcgl.UUCP> <1669@watdcsu.UUCP>
Organization: U. of Rochester, CS Dept.
Lines: 13

> 
> My normal impulse would be to agree with Scott.  But, if child porn was
> to be banned, and if the reason given for banning it was that producing
> it necessarily involves committing a crime, I would not be opposed to
> such a ban.  If the reason given was that child porn is disgusting, or
> that reading child porn gives people ideas about the sexual willingness
> of children, I would be opposed.
> 
How about a ban because it is both disgusting and illegal?  It would have
to be made illegal on the grounds that it is disgusting.  I would like
to see your reasons for why child porn should be made illegal.

ray


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com