Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lanl.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!lanl!crs
From: crs@lanl.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Possible Ban on Pornography
Message-ID: <30973@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 23-Sep-85 10:52:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: lanl.30973
Posted: Mon Sep 23 10:52:59 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Sep-85 10:45:37 EDT
References: <369@scirtp.UUCP> <4500038@ccvaxa> <2504@watcgl.UUCP> <1669@watdcsu.UUCP> <11729@rochester.UUCP>
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 22

> How about a ban because it is both disgusting and illegal?  It would have
> to be made illegal on the grounds that it is disgusting.  I would like
> to see your reasons for why child porn should be made illegal.
> 
> ray

How about "because you can't make child porn without using children
and it is already illegal to use children for such purposes" ???

I don't think it would be to much of a stretch of the immagination to
consider use of children for such purposes *child* *molestation*, do
you?

There is no way that a child can be considered a "consenting adult"!


-- 
All opinions are mine alone...

Charlie Sorsby
...!{cmcl2,ihnp4,...}!lanl!crs
crs@lanl.arpa


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com