Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site grkermi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!genrad!grkermi!andrew
From: andrew@grkermi.UUCP (Andrew W. Rogers)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Possible Ban on Pornography
Message-ID: <635@grkermi.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 25-Sep-85 11:07:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: grkermi.635
Posted: Wed Sep 25 11:07:40 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Sep-85 06:18:32 EDT
References: <369@scirtp.UUCP> <4500038@ccvaxa> <2504@watcgl.UUCP> <1669@watdcsu.UUCP> <11729@rochester.UUCP> <30973@lanl.ARPA>
Reply-To: andrew@grkermi.UUCP (Andrew W. Rogers)
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 16
Summary: 

In article <30973@lanl.ARPA> crs@lanl.ARPA writes:
>> ... I would like to see your reasons why child porn should be made illegal.
>> ray
>
>How about "because you can't make child porn without using children
>and it is already illegal to use children for such purposes" ???

What about written works?  Pornography existed long before the invention of
the camera, you know!  For one example, the Marquis de Sade's "120 Days of
Sodom" contains several explicit descriptions of sexual depravity with
pre-adolescents... is it "child porn" or not?

AWR

P.S.:	Q: How do you celebrate the Marquis de Sade's birthday?
	A: Whip up a cake!


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com