Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84 exptools; site ihlpg.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!ihlpg!tan
From: tan@ihlpg.UUCP (Bill Tanenbaum)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: handwriting
Message-ID: <1319@ihlpg.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 29-Sep-85 14:52:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihlpg.1319
Posted: Sun Sep 29 14:52:04 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 30-Sep-85 02:37:13 EDT
References: <653@deepthot.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 14

> [Lance Bailey]
> 	Why does it SEEM to be a standard rule that the handwriting of women
> is far superiour to that of men?  While a women'n writing is usually quite
> elegant with lovely rounded characters, the scrawl from men's pens is usually
> illegible. Stranger still, while I know of men with "better than average"
> script, I really can't think of any women who get complaints about their
> handwriting.
---
The above is a completely unwarranted generalization.  After 20 years
of trying, I still cannot read my mother-in-law's handwriting.  My
wife must read it for me.  My father-in-law's handwriting, on the
other hand, was beautiful.
-- 
Bill Tanenbaum - AT&T Bell Labs - Naperville IL  ihnp4!ihlpg!tan


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com