Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdcsu.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watdcsu!dmcanzi
From: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Newsgroups: net.women
Subject: Re: Porn and Rape: a social disease
Message-ID: <1711@watdcsu.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Sep-85 18:49:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: watdcsu.1711
Posted: Mon Sep 30 18:49:03 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 00:28:11 EDT
References: <10000008@orstcs.UUCP> <547@lasspvax.UUCP> <1695@watdcsu.UUCP> <1306@ihlpg.UUCP>
Reply-To: dmcanzi@watdcsu.UUCP (David Canzi)
Organization: University of Woolamaloo
Lines: 21
Summary: 

In article <1306@ihlpg.UUCP> tan@ihlpg.UUCP (Bill Tanenbaum) writes:
>There are two other flaws in Cheryl Stewart's argument that David
>Canzi does not touch on.
>1) The statistical correlation between
>rape and pornography has not been conclusively shown, unlike the
>overwhelming correlation between smoking and lung cancer.
>David's arguments only become relevant AFTER such a correlation
>is established.

Mea culpa.  I'd heard it *so* often that I thought it *must* be
true.

However, I insist that what I said is relevant anyway.  When
somebody advances an alleged proof of something, showing that any
step in the supposed proof is wrong is sufficient to show that the
proof is wrong.
-- 
David Canzi

"It's Reagan's fault.  Everything's Reagan's fault.  Floods... volcanoes...
herpes... Reagan's fault." -- Editor Overbeek, Bloom Beacon


Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com