Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site orca.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!orca!ariels From: ariels@orca.UUCP (Ariel Shattan) Newsgroups: net.women Subject: Re: handwriting Message-ID: <1780@orca.UUCP> Date: Sun, 29-Sep-85 22:01:50 EDT Article-I.D.: orca.1780 Posted: Sun Sep 29 22:01:50 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 2-Oct-85 07:24:53 EDT References: <653@deepthot.UUCP> Organization: sixes and sevens Lines: 24 > I've only been reading net.women for a few months so this might be a rehash.... > > > Why does it SEEM to be a standard rule that the handwriting of women > is far superiour to that of men? While a women'n writing is usually quite > elegant with lovely rounded characters, the scrawl from men's pens is usually > illegible. Stranger still, while I know of men with "better than average" > script, I really can't think of any women who get complaints about their > handwriting. > -- > decvax!{utzoo|watmath}!deepthot!zaphod > (Lance Bailey @ UWO Comp Sci, London, Canada) Oh, HO! You haven't seen *my* handwriting then, have you? My parents and grandparents insist on typewritten letters. I never have to worry about people reading my journal; they simply can't! No, Lance, there are plenty of women with awful handwriting, but then, the most interesting people have the most interesting (and least regular) handwriting, don't they? Ariel (what's this say?) Shattan ..!tektronix!orca!ariels Brought to you by Super Global Mega Corp .com