Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cbsck.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!cbsck!pmd From: pmd@cbsck.UUCP (Paul Dubuc) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: Re: "The child of a fiend" Message-ID: <1333@cbsck.UUCP> Date: Sun, 6-Oct-85 21:24:57 EDT Article-I.D.: cbsck.1333 Posted: Sun Oct 6 21:24:57 1985 Date-Received: Tue, 8-Oct-85 03:33:51 EDT References: <793@nmtvax.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories , Columbus Lines: 33 >Why should she be forced to carry the child of her attacker? The >rapist committed a crime against her that some women kill themselves >over (the shame, the fear, the horror of rape). Why should she want >to give life to his seed that has that gene: the gene for rape! The >thought of bringing another of HIS type into the world frightens >*me*, to say nothing of how it affects her. Every time she wakes up >with morning sickness she remembers the rape. The conflict of abortion >versus carrying a (very) unwanted child to term has driven some women >to suicide. The sins of the parents are visited upon their children. >In a case like this, the *father* is the one who is guilty of the murder >since *he* placed the child/fetus in an unsafe place. > >aardvark@nmtvax!unm-la!lanl!ihnp4... Every pro-choice response has seemed to agree that a fiendish child does not a rapist make, yet here is someone who seems to think it's genetic. Are you serious? What if the child's a girl? Maybe a jilting by a boyfriend has driven some young women to suicide? Do we condemn dating? I've gone into more detail in other articles about why I think the attachment of this stigma to the child is unjust. It is as unjust as if a woman were to take out her hatred for a wife-beater husband on his born children by beating them. Her behaviour might be more "understandible" in some sense, but still unjust. Anyway, it's interesting to see someone supporting the stigma (and on genetic grounds to boot!). I'm glad there aren't a lot of people who seriously believe that there are genes for criminal behaviour. There would be a lot more people thrown into jail as a "preventative" measure :-(. ... what was your name again? Paul Dubuc