Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site rruxo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!dual!qantel!ihnp4!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxv!rruxa!rruxo!vch From: vch@rruxo.UUCP (Kerro Panille) Newsgroups: net.abortion Subject: a survey Message-ID: <337@rruxo.UUCP> Date: Wed, 9-Oct-85 09:51:02 EDT Article-I.D.: rruxo.337 Posted: Wed Oct 9 09:51:02 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Oct-85 08:13:38 EDT Organization: Colony, Pandora Lines: 32 A while back I posted a survey, promising to compile the answers and post them. Well, I haven't had the time, as work has been real crazy lately. But I thought I'd mention something I noticed. Out of the 35 or so replys I recieved, only ONE (1) was from a self proclaimed "pro-lifer!" I don't think that I recieved a representative sample of the net.abortion population. Then again, mabye I did. I tend to think that the ratio of pro-life to pro-choice people is not 1:35. Either that, or the pro-life population is really a very small minority. The rest of the replys are very well distributed, in age, religious orientation, and sex (although more males replied than females). Almost every reply indicating a religion (some were athiest) said that they considered themselves strong belivers. Very few actually had abortions. When I find the time, I'll post the actual numbers and anything I can derive from them. Thanks to all who replied! Some of the replys were very enlightening. -- Vince Hatem ---------------- A Bell Communications Research | UZI |----------|_ _ _\/ T Raritan River Software Systems Center | |----------| /\ & 444 Hoes Lane ---------------- ROGER GUTS T 4D-360 / /\ DON'T NEED NO STINKIN' Piscataway, NJ 08854 / / TIES (201) 699-4869 /-----/ ...ihnp4!rruxo!vch TRUE GRIT MYSTERIES - The detective series for those who NEVER eat quiche! (WARNING - MAY BE EMOTIONALLY DISTURBING TO HAMSTER LOVERS)