Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site t12tst.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!sun!idi!t12tst!seshadri
From: seshadri@t12tst.UUCP (Raghavan Seshadri)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: Reply to Paul (categorizing things as non-human)
Message-ID: <685@t12tst.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 20-Oct-85 17:17:23 EDT
Article-I.D.: t12tst.685
Posted: Sun Oct 20 17:17:23 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 22-Oct-85 06:33:29 EDT
References: <215@rosevax.UUCP> <1349@cbsck.UUCP> <1212@mhuxt.UUCP>
Organization: Intel Microprocessor Mfg, Santa Clara
Lines: 16

> From: js2j@mhuxt.UUCP (sonntag)
> Date: 11 Oct 85 18:00:45 GMT
>       Not only is this how slavery is justified, it's how killing cattle
> for food is justified.  It is also the means by which the keeping of
> animal 'pets' is justified.  The principle of not legally protecting
> things outside the category of 'human being' is quite common and not
> dangerous at all.
> --
> Jeff Sonntag
> ihnp4!mhuxt!js2j
> 
Not dangerous to whom ? I agree that it is not dangerous to the person
who kills the cattle.The animal probably does not have such a sanguine
view.
-- 
Raghu Seshadri