Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site ccice2.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ritcv!ccice5!ccice2!pwk
From: pwk@ccice2.UUCP (Paul W. Karber)
Newsgroups: net.abortion
Subject: Re: manipulation, and a tale of the city
Message-ID: <671@ccice2.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 20-Oct-85 21:42:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: ccice2.671
Posted: Sun Oct 20 21:42:18 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Oct-85 08:11:27 EDT
References: <1989@reed.UUCP>
Reply-To: pwk@ccice2.UUCP (Paul W. Karber)
Organization: CCI Central Engineering, Rochester, NY
Lines: 33

In article <1989@reed.UUCP> thoma@reed.UUCP (Ann Muir Thomas) writes:

>I heard today of a girl whose parents threw her out of the house
>because she had an abortion.  She will never be welcomed back.

>You call this "better pro-life morals"?

No. I call in intolerance, which has nothing to do with the
true(*) pro-life position.

(*) I have also noticed that some people (who will remain nameless)
    oppose abortion on purely religious and/or moral grounds that
    do not seem concerned with whether the fetus is a life or not.
    I would not consider this a true pro-life position.

>Ann

>(BTW, Mr. Dubuc seems to manipulating us by always saying "she"
>when referring to a fetus.  Take note!)

Ah, my feelings are hurt.  I've been trying to manipulate you
by using gender neutral pronouns, and you didn't even notice. :-)

But seriously now, do you believe that some of our readers
think one sex is better then the other?  Unless one believes
a particular sex is superior how can the choice of pronoun
affect you?

-- 

Of course I could be wrong.

siesmo!rochester!ccice5!ccice2!pwk