Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site lsuc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.arch,net.micro.6809
Subject: Re: Architecture, or Coincidence?
Message-ID: <838@lsuc.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-Oct-85 10:30:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: lsuc.838
Posted: Thu Oct 10 10:30:44 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 10-Oct-85 10:54:26 EDT
References: <482@ihwpt.UUCP> <> <792@nmtvax.UUCP> <500@ihwpt.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura)
Distribution: net
Organization: Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
Lines: 14
Summary: Commodore disk speed


     Just for your interest, I was also under the impression that
the Commodore disc was slower than the CoCo cassette.  It isn't
I can't remember the baud rate exactly, but it's a few times faster.

                                   Cheers! -- Jim O.
It's still amazingly slow though.  The new 128 is faster.

-- 
James Omura, Barrister & Solicitor, Toronto
ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura
Byte Information eXchange: jimomura
Compuserve: 72205,541
MTS at WU: GKL6