Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site alberta.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsri!ubc-vision!alberta!andrew From: andrew@alberta.UUCP (Andrew Folkins) Newsgroups: net.astro Subject: Re: Occultations, conjunctions, and the like Message-ID: <698@alberta.UUCP> Date: Mon, 21-Oct-85 09:52:58 EDT Article-I.D.: alberta.698 Posted: Mon Oct 21 09:52:58 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 21-Oct-85 19:52:13 EDT References: <2195@brl-tgr.ARPA> <673@astrovax.UUCP> Reply-To: andrew@pembina.UUCP (Andrew Folkins) Distribution: net Organization: U. of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Lines: 32 Summary: In article <673@astrovax.UUCP> sutin@astrovax.UUCP (Brian M. Sutin) writes: >> Why does there seem to be so much interest among astronomy popularizers or >> amateur skygazers regarding the common and inevitable patterns that >> appear to us on the Earth's surface from the various positions of >> astronomical bodies? ... > >I believe the interest has nothing to do with astronomy at all, but >astrology. The age of Aquarius coming when Mars wraps around Jupiter, and >all that malarky. > > >Brian Sutin >astrovax!sutin On the contrary. Occultations provide real scientific data (size, shape, etc. of occulting body), IF enough observations are collected. This is one area in which amateur astronomers can make significant contributions. (I think it was Sky & Telescope which organized observations about a year ago when one of the major asteriods occulted a star. A while later they published a profile of the asteroid, as determined from the disappearance and reappearance times of the star from different latitudes.) Conjunctions are just plain nice to look at, especially if the two objects are close enough to be seen together through a pair of binoculars or a telescope. It is also fun to watch the two objects approach and then separate over a period of weeks. -- Andrew Folkins ...ihnp4!alberta!andrew All ideas in this message are fictional. Any resemblance, to any idea, living or dead, is purely coincidental.