Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles hp 1.3 exp 09/24/84; site hplsla.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tikal!hplsla!danz
From: danz@hplsla.UUCP (danz)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: subwoofers and xovers
Message-ID: <8900001@hplsla.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-Oct-85 10:48:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hplsla.8900001
Posted: Thu Oct 10 10:48:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Oct-85 18:30:01 EDT
References: <1395@teddy.UUCP>
Lines: 10
Nf-ID: #R:teddy:-139500:hplsla:8900001:000:343
Nf-From: hplsla!danz    Oct 10 07:48:00 1985



You mention that a "passive crossover" is hard to design and build for
this range of frequencies.  Sounds reasonable to me, and it inspires
another question.

How about active crossovers?  Has anyone out there tried one for this
frequency range, and if they have, how were the results?

Dan (don't accuse me of being an electrical engineer)