Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site isucs1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!stolaf!umn-cs!isucs1!notes
From: notes@isucs1.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Re: Digital recording...
Message-ID: <457@isucs1.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 14-Oct-85 04:01:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: isucs1.457
Posted: Mon Oct 14 04:01:10 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Oct-85 20:23:55 EDT
Sender: notes@isucs1.UUCP
Organization: Iowa State University
Lines: 22
Nf-ID: #R:decwrl:-61000:isucs1:47700023:000:965
Nf-From: isucs1!jobusch    Oct  4 01:32:00 1985

For those who may be interested...
I recall seeing an article in a recent issue of Audio(?) that those
who talk about such  things as setting the standards for the digital
tape machine were considering making the sampling rate different than
a multiple of 44.1K. According to the article, this would prevent
"exact <bit for bit> digital copies" of CDs. Hmmmmm.

As for the original note, at least I am excited about the prosepcts of
digital tape machines. Although it is easier to just pop in a disk, tapes
offer the ability to arrange songs (from any disk) as you would. 
Also, it would be nice to record an analog album and have a "perfect"
tape copy of it, rather than wearing down the albums!

($1000+ t-table owners, please dont flame ! :-}    )

Dave Jobusch at Iowa State University
CSNET       : jobusch@iowa-state
USENET/UUCP : isucs1!jobusch

"...or is it just involuntary pelvic contractions?..." - Frankie GTH
And they think the Boss is a lyricist...