Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.8 $; site uiucdcsb
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcsb!neth
From: neth@uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Comments on NAK and others
Message-ID: <5700097@uiucdcsb>
Date: Wed, 16-Oct-85 21:47:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcsb.5700097
Posted: Wed Oct 16 21:47:00 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Oct-85 05:11:26 EDT
References: <4500001@uiucuxa>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:uiucuxa:4500001:uiucdcsb:5700097:000:503
Nf-From: uiucdcsb.CS.UIUC.EDU!neth    Oct 16 20:47:00 1985


I once had a roomate who owned a Nakamichi BX 150.  He really loved it, and I 
would have to agree with him.  It would outperform all but the *most* expensive
Harman Kardon decks.  At that time it was well situated price wise against 
the competitors. (~$500 vs ~$900)  I made many tapes on this deck and am happy
with all of them.  I use them for 'stereo shopping' and the salesmen always 
want to know where I got the tape.  When I say Nakamichi, they retreat to the
backroom where they all live....