Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hound.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hound!rfg
From: rfg@hound.UUCP (R.GRANTGES)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: BOSE 901 Series Speakers
Message-ID: <1434@hound.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 21-Oct-85 23:26:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: hound.1434
Posted: Mon Oct 21 23:26:53 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Oct-85 03:48:06 EDT
References: <72@ecn-aa.UUCP> <1404@teddy.UUCP> <339@nrcvax.UUCP> <357@unc.unc.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 20

[]]
Tim, your article is typical of most of the anti-901 articles I read.
Quote (sort of) ...I even saw one installed backwards with most of the
drivers facing away from the listeners...end quote. THAT is the CORRECT
way. The way they were designed to be used. You guys insist on 
listening to them backwards! Small wonder. Wow!
The PA version has all the drivers aimed out the front, The 901, all but
one aimed out the back. The two versions are intended to function
quite differently. THey share a similar speaker design.

I repeat for posterity. I don't own or particularly like Bose. I do have
a bose PA catalog and recommend them for certain applications. I don't
sell anything, let alone Bose speakers. I just hate uninformed bad
mouthing. I acn remember no one (well hardly ) liked vilchurs rotten
little absurd speaker.
hound!rfg

-- 

"It's the thought, if any, that counts!"  Dick Grantges  hound!rfg