Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cubsvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!dual!lll-crg!seismo!cmcl2!rna!cubsvax!peters
From: peters@cubsvax.UUCP (Peter S. Shenkin)
Newsgroups: net.bicycle
Subject: Re: Cannondale frame quality
Message-ID: <366@cubsvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 4-Oct-85 18:53:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: cubsvax.366
Posted: Fri Oct  4 18:53:14 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 7-Oct-85 05:07:02 EDT
References: <246@tekchips.UUCP> <4200027@uiucdcsp> <>
Reply-To: peters@cubsvax.UUCP (Peter S. Shenkin)
Organization: Columbia Univ Biology, New York City
Lines: 11

In article <> wew@mgweed.UUCP writes:
>Without an exception, Cannondale owners come over to
>look at the Klein and start comparing wheel stay length
>and tube diameter and weld finishes and paint finish
>and weight and color. [...etc.]

Well, what did they, and you, conclude from such comparisons?
	-P. Shenkin

Also, any thoughts on Vitus? (cemented aluminum frame). The folks I've run 
into on the road (metaphorically speaking) who have them love them.