Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site petsd.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!houxm!vax135!petsd!cjh From: cjh@petsd.UUCP (Chris Henrich) Newsgroups: net.flame,net.politics Subject: Re: State Terrorism Message-ID: <659@petsd.UUCP> Date: Sat, 12-Oct-85 16:01:41 EDT Article-I.D.: petsd.659 Posted: Sat Oct 12 16:01:41 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 14-Oct-85 04:27:47 EDT References: <903@abnji.UUCP> Reply-To: cjh@petsd.UUCP (PUT YOUR NAME HERE) Organization: Perkin-Elmer DSG, Tinton Falls, N.J. Lines: 37 Xref: watmath net.flame:12292 net.politics:11463 [] In article <903@abnji.UUCP> nyssa@abnji.UUCP (nyssa of traken, also known as James C. Armstrong, Jr.) writes: >Well, I'll bet that many of you are happy that the US Government has >hijacked a plane on which the alleged terrorists were leaving >Egypt. ... By the US legal >system, these people were guilty of NO crimes, yet were adbucted >without the due process of the law being followed. The alleged terrorists allegedly committed acts of piracy upon the high seas. By a long-established tradition, any law-enforcement agency which can lay hands upon pirates has authority to do so. The four persons who were arrested are being held for trial, rather than being summarily executed. They will have a chance to present their defense. Let me offer some possible lines of argument: 1. They weren't the real terrorists; somebody else did it; this is all a case of mistaken identity. 2. The man who was allegedly killed isn't really dead, he's only pretending. 3. The man whom they killed was attacking them, and they had no recourse but to fire on him in self defense. Oh, I forgot, he was in a wheel chair. Well, I said these were possible lines of defense, I didn't promise that they were likely. Regards, Chris -- Full-Name: Christopher J. Henrich UUCP: ..!(cornell | ariel | ukc | houxz)!vax135!petsd!cjh US Mail: MS 313; Perkin-Elmer; 106 Apple St; Tinton Falls, NJ 07724 Phone: (201) 758-7288