Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site wucec2.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!mgnetp!we53!busch!wucs!wucec2!ph From: ph@wucec2.UUCP (Paul Hahn) Newsgroups: net.flame,net.music,net.music.classical Subject: Re: Noise pollution (flame) Message-ID: <1103@wucec2.UUCP> Date: Sat, 12-Oct-85 15:10:10 EDT Article-I.D.: wucec2.1103 Posted: Sat Oct 12 15:10:10 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 14-Oct-85 04:29:14 EDT References: <1227@ihuxe.UUCP> <771@rduxb.UUCP> Reply-To: ph@wucec2.UUCP (Paul Hahn) Organization: Washington U. in St. Louis Lines: 37 Xref: watmath net.flame:12293 net.music:9592 net.music.classical:1368 In article <771@rduxb.UUCP> jmd@rduxb.UUCP (Joseph M. Dakes) writes: >> I didn't much care for pop music when I was a teen, and I still don't. >> I am FED UP with having others musical preferences forced on me. > >Are you suggesting that you want your musical preferences forced on others? I don't think he is, unless you want to call silence music. (No, I don't want to get into a discussion about John Cage.) >> * At play * Around here, all the city owned swimming pools are >> equipped with metal horn loudspeakers -- the better to >> blare top 40 MOR music with. The park district people >> respond "but most people using the pools like it". >> Maybe so, but it is my pool too - I pay taxes to >> maintain and operate it. > >Big whoop! So do the other people that use the pool. Remember this is a >democracy, majority rules. If you don't like it move somewhere else. > >> * At home * My city gov't thinks it's a great idea to allow >> the merchants assoc. to hire rock bands to play in >> city parking lots -- LOUD, you can hear it over a >> mile away. I don't LIKE being forced out of my home >> by city hall. > >It is a great idea. It gives kids something to do and it keeps them amused. >And again here, its a democracy. If you don't like it vote for other >city leaders. Does your idea of democracy state that if 51% of us decide to infringe on the rights of the other 49% that is all fine and dandy? "Majority rule" should not be absolute by any means. --pH /* * "What you mean `we', paleface?" */