Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site alice.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!alice!jj
From: jj@alice.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: Noise pollution, majority rules
Message-ID: <4449@alice.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-Oct-85 11:01:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: alice.4449
Posted: Wed Oct 16 11:01:01 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 18-Oct-85 00:24:45 EDT
References: <1230@ihuxe.UUCP>, <793@rduxb.UUCP>
Organization: New Jersey State Farm for the Terminally Bewildered
Lines: 24

Well, Joseph D, I'm glad that someone else misread the
original article.  The ORIGINAL writer said that
people, NOT THE PLACE OF WORK, were responsible for
the noise at work.  He specifically said that various
blaster-type portables were the problem at work.  
Don't misquote me, misquoting the original.


Having seen, now, the comments from both the original
poster and the offensive flame-backer, I think you
deserve each other.

Both of you just remember:  In my own house, I HAVE LEGAL
freedom from your noise, or your desire to have no noise
whatsoever.  (If I keep noise down to near ambient off
my property, then I'm being reasonable.  If you put noise
far above ambient all the way into my house, you're
invading... Of course, that is symmetric...)

-- 
SUPPORT SECULAR TEDDY-BEAR-ISM.
"... who stole the keeshka, someone call the cops!"

(ihnp4/allegra)!alice!jj