Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mmintl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!panda!talcott!harvard!seismo!utah-cs!utah-gr!pwa-b!mmintl!howarde
From: howarde@mmintl.UUCP (Howard Eglowstein)
Newsgroups: net.news,net.misc,net.flame
Subject: Re: USENET frowning upon graphics in signatures
Message-ID: <722@mmintl.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Oct-85 10:27:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: mmintl.722
Posted: Tue Oct 22 10:27:06 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Oct-85 02:19:13 EDT
References: <491@scirtp.UUCP> <454@bdmrrr.UUCP>
Reply-To: howarde@mmintl.UUCP (Howard Eglowstein)
Distribution: net
Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT
Lines: 10
Xref: watmath net.news:4133 net.misc:8747 net.flame:12463



I would agree with Todd Jones and Al Gates.  I find graphics at the end of a
posting MUCH LESS offensive than postings by people who include the entire
article they're referencing.  Reading the same article 5 or 6 times a day at
1200 baud is REAL boring.  The graphics get a bit redundant too, but nothing
compared to repostings.  Yucko.



"Whoops Mr. Moto, I'm a coffee pot..."