Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cad.cs.cmu.edu
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!cad.cs.cmu.edu!mjc
From: mjc@cad.cs.cmu.edu (Monica Cellio)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.flame
Subject: Re: proposed destruction of net.bizarre
Message-ID: <384@cad.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 23-Oct-85 21:46:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: cad.384
Posted: Wed Oct 23 21:46:45 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Oct-85 04:34:16 EDT
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 19
Xref: watmath net.news.group:3958 net.flame:12475

From: mcb@k.cs.cmu.edu
>Yes, there was a discussion in net.news.group, but I doubt if most of the
>bizarre people participated.  [...]
>WHY DIDN'T YOU CROSSPOST THE DELETION DISCUSSION TO NET.BIZARRE SO THAT
>EVERYONE COULD PARTICIPATE???

I don't have the old posts to back this up, but I think the initial message
in that discussion was posted to net.bizarre as well.  If people can't take
enough of an interest to read net.news.group when their pet group is being
discussed, I hardly think the rest of the net is to blame.  What you are
implying is that almost every message in net.news.group should be
cross-posted somewhere else as well.

						-Dragon

P.S. This is obviously a vote against net.bizarre.
-- 
UUCP: ...ucbvax!dual!lll-crg!dragon
ARPA: monica.cellio@cmu-cs-cad or dragon@lll-crg