Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site stcvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxf!mhuxi!mhuxh!mhuxv!mhuxt!houxm!mtuxo!mtunh!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!stcvax!rlr
From: rlr@stcvax.UUCP (Roger Rose)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Re: Terrorism Inc.
Message-ID: <417@stcvax.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 13-Oct-85 23:30:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: stcvax.417
Posted: Sun Oct 13 23:30:53 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 17-Oct-85 01:23:36 EDT
References: <487@ittvax.ATC.ITT.UUCP>, <34@unc.unc.UUCP>
Organization: Storage Technology Corp.  Louisville, CO
Lines: 26

>>3) The French government sends a team of frogmen to blow up a boat of
>>"Green-Peace", an anti nuke organization who was planning to demonstrate
>>against french nuclear tests in the Pacific.  At least one person is killed. 
>
>The sinking of the Greenpeace ship was NOT an act of terrorism.
>It was an act of sabotage.
>
>Definitions:
>	Sabotage -- Secret attack aimed at destroying of enemy property.
>		    Unintentional civilian deaths may result as an unavoidable
>		    (and undesired) side-effect.
>
>	Terrorism -- Intentional murder or kidnapping of civilians.
>
>	Frank Silbermann

Why would anyone consider an international organization for peace,
which has never initiated any acts of aggression, to be an "enemy"?
Likewise, how does an unarmed ship, owned by such an organization,
constitute "enemy property"?
-- 

Roger Rose
   UUCP:    {hao ihnp4 decvax}!stcvax!rlr
   USnail:  Storage Technology Corp. - MD 3T / Louisville, Co.  80028
   phone:   673-6873