Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!usenet From: usenet@ucbvax.ARPA (USENET News Administration) Newsgroups: net.invest Subject: Re: Info on \"Ginny Maes\" Message-ID: <10667@ucbvax.ARPA> Date: Tue, 15-Oct-85 16:01:12 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.10667 Posted: Tue Oct 15 16:01:12 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 17-Oct-85 00:49:44 EDT References: <844@decwrl.UUCP> Reply-To: mazlack@ucbernie.UUCP (Lawrence J. Mazlack) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 27 >I would appreciate it if any of you investment geniuses out there would >comment on the advisability of investing in Ginny Maes. I have a relative >who has about $50,000 to invest. This money is now in regular savings >accounts. The relative is elderly, and this is her only liquid assets, >aside from her pension and Social Security. > >Specifically, what are the pros and cons? How long is the money tied up? >What is the minimum you have to invest? Are there better solutions for >a person in her position (widowed and retired)? > The advantages are: secure principal and higher than T-bill interest return The disadvantages are: (1) you don't know how long it will be good for as these are loans that can be paid back at any time (2) Until maturity, they trade as if bonds; i.e., their value can be less than (or greater than) what you originally paid for them (3) There is some book keeping involved (4) The normal trading amount is $100,000. However, you can buy smaller hunks (at a premium) From: mazlack@ucbernie.BERKELEY.EDU (Lawrence J. &) Path: ucbernie!mazlack If you do go with them, I would recomment Vanguard's no-load GNMA fund. (I personally use it for my IRA) However, for a widow, I think that she would be better off with a collection of T-bonds with different maturities. T-bonds come in $10,000 hunks.