Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 (Tek) 9/28/84 based on 9/17/84; site tektronix.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!qantel!hplabs!tektronix!michaelo
From: michaelo@tektronix.UUCP (Michael O'Hair)
Newsgroups: net.jokes
Subject: Re: Definition of recursion
Message-ID: <5806@tektronix.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-Oct-85 13:02:55 EDT
Article-I.D.: tektroni.5806
Posted: Thu Oct 10 13:02:55 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Oct-85 20:43:29 EDT
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 28

[ this is not here ]

>   		Recursion:    See Recursion.

You forgot the first rule of recursion: check the trivial case, then recurse

So it should go:

		Recursion:	If not bored, then see recursion.

Oh yes, a joke.  Very well.

	Q.  What's the difference between {APL, C, COBOL, FORTRAN, ...}
	    and forcible sodomy?

	A.  Not much.

<< Standard disclaimer:  I deny it all.
<< Standard witticism:   Screw elegance, I work in C.

			Michael O'Hair
			Tektronix, Inc.
			P.O. Box 500
			Beaverton, OR 97077
	Temporarily at:
			M/S Y6-546
			1-503-627-8384
			tektronix!michaelo