Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site cyb-eng.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!ut-sally!cyb-eng!bc From: bc@cyb-eng.UUCP (Bill Crews) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards,net.lan Subject: Re: STREAMS query Message-ID: <740@cyb-eng.UUCP> Date: Wed, 9-Oct-85 13:40:16 EDT Article-I.D.: cyb-eng.740 Posted: Wed Oct 9 13:40:16 1985 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Oct-85 18:24:10 EDT References: <471@enmasse.UUCP> <1699@brl-tgr.ARPA> <449@cheviot.uucp> <1542@hammer.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Cyb Systems, Austin, TX Lines: 37 Xref: watmath net.unix-wizards:15183 net.lan:1076 > streams are better architecturally, but they don't exist > (at least in a form that mortals can get hold of) > > sockets are available, and do much of what is needed, but > lack elegance. > > Steve Glaser At the risk of being overly simplistic . . . Telephones are great! I can call someone specific, talk to him/her without keying a mike each time or any other such bother, no one else can here what we say (:-) . . . They are great! BUT . . . imagine having a CB radio in your car and driving down the highway. You want to monitor the Smoky reports, and you may want to report some Smokies of your own. Now, imagine what it would be like if the ONLY thing allowed on channel 19 is a request for a specific other CB station to switch with you to a private channel, where you can converse and then switch back to channel 19. It would totally destroy the intended use of the CB service. The point is that, in the real world, there are applications where circuits are clearly best AND there are those where datagrams are clearly best. If one tries to shoehorn one into the other, our ability to model the real world is significantly diminished. I tend to be a datagram service advocate -- but ONLY because there seem to be so many people out there who have no personal need for anything other than circuit networking and who therefore want to abolish datagram service or other- wise reduce it to klugedom. WHY??? The need is real; circuits don't suffice; let datagrams co-exist with circuits! -- / \ Bill Crews ( bc ) Cyb Systems, Inc \__/ Austin, Texas [ gatech | ihnp4 | nbires | seismo | ucbvax ] ! ut-sally ! cyb-eng ! bc