Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!cottrell@NBS-VMS.ARPA
From: cottrell@NBS-VMS.ARPA (COTTRELL, JAMES)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Language Extensions
Message-ID: <1967@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 7-Oct-85 19:23:37 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.1967
Posted: Mon Oct  7 19:23:37 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 9-Oct-85 06:32:56 EDT
Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA
Lines: 27

/*
> > I'm not entirely sure I agree with you about adding construx to the
> > language tho. I once saw this thruout a bunch of sources:
> > 
> I'm quite sure I disagree with the constructs you appear to be adding to
> the language --- the English language. 
> 
> #ifdef cottrell
>    #define construx constructs
>    #define tho      though
>    #define thruout  throughout
> #endif
>
> Ed Nather
> Astronomy Dept, U of Texas @ Austin
> {allegra,ihnp4}!{noao,ut-sally}!utastro!nather
> nather@astro.UTEXAS.EDU

Very good Ed! I hope you don't live on a `No Thru Street' :-)
I just like the letter x. Any objexions? Fair Enuf?

	jim		cottrell@nbs

P.S. How many ways can you pronounce `ough'?
Thought, though, through, bough, enough, any more?
*/
------