Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site lll-crg.ARpA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!brooks
From: brooks@lll-crg.ARpA (Eugene D. Brooks III)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Re: Unix/C program modularity
Message-ID: <940@lll-crg.ARpA>
Date: Wed, 23-Oct-85 20:55:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: lll-crg.940
Posted: Wed Oct 23 20:55:16 1985
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Oct-85 02:18:18 EDT
References: <637@dicomed.UUCP> <2220@brl-tgr.ARPA> <2426@sjuvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: brooks@lll-crg.UUCP (Eugene D. Brooks III)
Organization: Lawrence Livermore Labs, CRG Group
Lines: 10

In article <2426@sjuvax.UUCP> jss@sjuvax.UUCP (J. Shapiro) writes:
>Doug, you are entirely correct, but this does not negate the case in
>favor of lower level reusability.  Go figure out one day how much of
>your disk is being used by copies of the C library. Compile a program

An interesting proposition, I found megabytes tied up with copies of
1 and 0 in executable programs.  We of course used find to ferret them
out and remove them "$%&')(%$#%&'

sh: postnews not found					:-)