Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site psivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!psivax!friesen
From: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Newsgroups: net.legal
Subject: Re: legal definition of practice of medicine
Message-ID: <796@psivax.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-Oct-85 17:52:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: psivax.796
Posted: Wed Oct 16 17:52:31 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Oct-85 07:56:03 EDT
References: <10573@ucbvax.ARPA> <376@mot.UUCP>
Reply-To: friesen@psivax.UUCP (Stanley Friesen)
Organization: Pacesetter Systems Inc., Sylmar, CA
Lines: 20


In article <376@mot.UUCP> you write:
>*** REPLACE THIS MESS WITH YOUR LINEAGE ***
>
>Titillating Part: Especially amazing are the laws relating to sexual 
>conduct: they are riddled with phrases like "crime against nature", 
>"moral nuisance", "lewd behavior", etc. instead of saying exactly what 
>you are allowed to do with exactly what parts of your anatomy.  
>
	Well, that dedends upon the state. Try reading the Kansas
Statutes sometime. They are considerably more explicit(and *precise*).
I do not believe you will find any of the above phrases in the current
Kansas statutes.(The old version, which was replaced in toto sometime
during the 60's, *did* have that sort of language.)
-- 

				Sarima (Stanley Friesen)

UUCP: {ttidca|ihnp4|sdcrdcf|quad1|nrcvax|bellcore|logico}!psivax!friesen
ARPA: ttidca!psivax!friesen@rand-unix.arpa