Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site down.FUN
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!down!honey
From: honey@down.FUN (Peter Honeyman)
Newsgroups: net.mail
Subject: Re: more on domains
Message-ID: <609@down.FUN>
Date: Tue, 22-Oct-85 13:04:13 EDT
Article-I.D.: down.609
Posted: Tue Oct 22 13:04:13 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 23-Oct-85 06:14:47 EDT
References: <1748@akgua.UUCP> <844@vortex.UUCP>
Organization: CS Dept., Princeton University
Lines: 10

lauren's assertion to the contrary, mail routing does not \require/
information about the treatment of addresses at every site.
furthermore, while such data might be useful, the classification
problem would be intractable.

for example, i use pathparse, so you might say that my treatment is the
correct one (or you might not).  but you can't categorize it as bangist
or domainist or any other simple term.

	peter