Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site dataioDataio.UUCP Path: utzoo!decvax!tektronix!uw-beaver!uw-june!entropy!dataio!bjorn From: bjorn@dataioDataio.UUCP (Bjorn Benson) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga impressions et al Message-ID: <835@dataioDataio.UUCP> Date: Mon, 14-Oct-85 09:23:01 EDT Article-I.D.: dataioDa.835 Posted: Mon Oct 14 09:23:01 1985 Date-Received: Wed, 16-Oct-85 06:22:23 EDT Reply-To: bjorn@dataio.UUCP (Bjorn Benson Distribution: na Organization: Data I/O Corp., Redmond WA Lines: 33 Keywords: keyboard feel, speed Xref: tektronix net.micro.amiga:00388 >a) It is externally a well designed low-profile machine, with space >underneath for a so-so keyboard - layout is ok, but (subjective) feel is >mushy. I have used the Amiga for development (not having a Sun or a PC), and I find the keyboard to be acceptable. It feels good and 99% of the keys are in the right places. No keys are missing [like the Mac]. >e) The multi-tasking worked nicely... Yes, and you can even compile in the background! [Take that Atari] I compile one program in one window and edit in another and neither process suffers (1 Human bound, 1 Disk bound). >f) When loading a window with icons, the machine was unexplainably slow, >with each icon taking about 1 second to appear. Why? Each window represents a directory. In the directory are any number of files. Any file that gets displayed as an icon has a *.info file to describe it. When the WorkBench in building the window, these files are searched for, opened and read one at a time. Ugh! My personal opinion is that the windows are nice, and they work well, but the icon based system is too limiting. I prefer the CLI interface with multiple virtual terminals. I like the Amiga, I have not tried an Atari. After progressing from RSTS/E to UNIX 4.2, any computer I own must have a multi-tasking operating system (not just the capability for one), and some decent windows. Wishing for a hard disk, Bjorn Benson