Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site nlm-vax.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!seismo!brl-tgr!nlm-mcs!nlm-vax!randy
From: randy@nlm-vax.ARPA (Rand Huntzinger)
Newsgroups: net.micro.atari
Subject: Re: Misc. comments about ST & ST questions
Message-ID: <824@nlm-vax.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 21-Oct-85 12:12:34 EDT
Article-I.D.: nlm-vax.824
Posted: Mon Oct 21 12:12:34 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 24-Oct-85 00:21:17 EDT
References: <757@nlm-vax.ARPA> <21045@mgweed.UUCP>
Reply-To: randy@nlm-vax.UUCP (Rand Huntzinger)
Distribution: net
Organization: NLM/LHNCBC, Bethesda, Md.
Lines: 16

In article <21045@mgweed.UUCP> kek@mgweed.UUCP (Kit Kimes) writes:
>
>>I feel sorry for those in this
>>newsgroups who have 400/800 machines and have to wade through all
>>of this.
>
...
>Even so, I hope to own an ST some day (probably the 260STD) so I am 
>greatful for all the information that is posted here every day on the
>ST line of computers.

My point was not that we should stop talking about the ST on net.micro.atari,
but that one particular discussion (a very partisan comparison of the ST vs.
Amiga) was becoming tiresome.  That discussion seems to died down about now,
and I'm looking forward to seeing some more interesting technical discussions
of the ST.