Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site brl-tgr.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!seismo!brl-tgr!tgr!STANLEY@USC-ECLB.ARPA From: STANLEY@USC-ECLB.ARPA Newsgroups: net.micro.cpm Subject: Re: read/write 48 tpi disks on 96 tpi drives Message-ID: <2060@brl-tgr.ARPA> Date: Fri, 11-Oct-85 12:51:19 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.2060 Posted: Fri Oct 11 12:51:19 1985 Date-Received: Mon, 14-Oct-85 04:08:17 EDT Sender: news@brl-tgr.ARPA Lines: 25 Received: from PICA-LCA.ARPA by USC-ECLB.ARPA; Fri 11 Oct 85 04:56:14-PDT Date: Fri, 11 Oct 85 7:48:36 EDT From: Kenneth E. Van_Camp (LCWSL) To: stanley@usc-eclb.arpa Cc: info-cpm@amsaa.arpa Subject: read/write 48 tpi disks on 96 tpi drives Return-Path: I disagree with Dick Stanley on writing 48 tpi disks on 96 tpi drives. I've been reading & writing this way on my IBM PC AT for quite a while with no complications (DOS 2.10). --Ken Van Camp -------------------- Ken, I'm glad to know it can be done with repeatability. Any hints you can offer on how to get the write part to work dependably will be greatly appreciated. My H89 won't do that at all, and out PC/AT at the office bats no better than .400. ...Dick