Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/3/84; site sesame.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ucbvax!ucdavis!lll-crg!seismo!harvard!talcott!sesame!slerner
From: slerner@sesame.UUCP (Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: Word perfect 4.0:  Information wanted
Message-ID: <351@sesame.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-Oct-85 18:02:28 EDT
Article-I.D.: sesame.351
Posted: Thu Oct 10 18:02:28 1985
Date-Received: Mon, 14-Oct-85 04:07:35 EDT
References: <1535@emory.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Lotus Development Corp
Lines: 30
Xref: watmath net.micro:12339 net.micro.pc:5582


I have used both extensivly and I have found word perfect both:

more powerful
easier to learn
easier to use
faster to use (get the job done in less time)

Also, word perfect has a much better dictionary (and the newest version, 4.1,
also has a built in thesaurus (wish I had the spell checker now!))

I could go on for pages, but it would all be the same flavor as the above.
I evaluated 15 different packages in depth before certifying word perfect
as to word processor of choice at my previous job and I still try out most of
the major new word processors as they come out.  To date I have found nothing
as good as word perfect.

THIS IS MY OWN PERSONAL OPINION AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LOTUS DEVELOPMENT.


-- 
Opinions expressed are public domain, and do not belong to Lotus
Development Corp.
----------------------------------------------------------------

Simcha-Yitzchak Lerner

              {genrad|ihnp4|ima}!wjh12!talcott!sesame!slerner
                      {cbosgd|harvard}!talcott!sesame!slerner
                       talcott!sesame!slerner@harvard.ARPA